PENERAPAN METODE 360 DERAJAT DAN ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) DALAM SISTEM PENILAIAN KINERJA PEGAWAI (STUDI KASUS : RUMAH SAKIT FADILAH PRABUMULIH)

  • Suzi Oktavia Kunang Universitas Bina Darma
  • Agus Bayu Samsil Universitas Bina Darma
Keywords: Decision Support System, 360 Degrees, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Abstract

Decision support System software is very useful in the assessment process of employee performance. This study implements a method known as method name 360 degrees. This method conducts feedback evaluation by combining various feedback obtained from coworkers, employees, subordinates, officers and company customers, results of the feedback assessment process will continue with the process  Assessment by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method which results in the decision by comparing the priority criteria so that the weight value of each criterion has been obtained by the decision. Are sorted from the largest value to the smallest. The results of the study obtained the performance value of employees in the company derived from the assessments given to all employees involved in the assessment.

References

Adhy Purnama. (2015). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pejabat Kopertis Wilayah Iii Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 20, 18–29.

Ali Hasan, SMn., M. ., & Universitas, D. (2013). Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai dengan Metode 360 Degrees Feedback. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/161842189/Penilaian-Kinerja-Dengan-Metode-360-Derajat

Antonioni, D. (1996). Designing an effective 360-degree appraisal feedback process. Organizational Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(96)90023-6

Beehr, T. A., Ivanitskaya, L., Hansen, C. P., Erofeev, D., & Gudanowski, D. M. (2001). Evaluation of 360 degree feedback ratings: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, pp.775-784. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.113

deLeon, L., & Ewen, A. J. (1997). Multi-Source Performance Appraisals: Employee Perceptions of Fairness. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 17(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X9701700103

Fleenor, J. W., & Prince, J. M. (1997). Using 360-Degree Feedback in Organizations An Annotated Bibliography. North Carolinahttps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/54dc/adff45d3cb7ab29303e4f69ce71c3b178746.pdf: Center for Creative Leadership ,Greensboro, North Carolina. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/54dc/adff45d3cb7ab29303e4f69ce71c3b178746.pdf

Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2001). Organizational Behavior. In Fifth Edition” New York, Mc Grow-Hill Company,Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8760(91)90022-P

Kusrini. (2007). Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Andi Offset.Yogyakarta.
Linman, T. (2006). 360-degree Feedback. Weighing the Pros and Cons.

Paré, G., Tremblay, M., & Lalonde, P. (2004). The impact of human resources practices on IT personnel commitment, citizenship behaviors, and turnover intentions. The Twenty First InternationalSocial Justice Research, 17, 3–21,.

S.G.N.L, W. (2013). Penerapan Metode 360 Derajat dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Jurusan SMA Berbasis Web. In Proceding Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi, ISSN1907-9022, 2013. (pp. 40–50). Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/174840-ID-penerapan-metode-360-derajat-dalam-siste.pdf

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME10-01-0028

Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. (2000). Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications.

Tziner, A., Joanis, C., & Murphy, K. R. (2000). A comparison of three methods of performance appraisal with regard to goal A Comparison Of Three Methods of Performance Appraisal With Regard To Goal Properties, Goal Perceptions & Ratee Satisfaction. Group & Organization Management, 25(2), 175–190.

Widyowati, A. (2010). penilaian-kinerja-360-derajat-sebagai-usaha-meningkatkan-persepsi-positif-terhadap Keadilan Prosedural Penilaian Kinerja. Jurnal Humanitas, 7(No.1), 89–100. Retrieved from http://eprints.uad.ac.id

Yamaguchi, I. (2005). Interpersonal communication tactics and procedural justice for uncertainty management of Japanese workers. Journal of Business Communication, 42(2), pp.168-194,. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943605274600
Published
2019-01-10
How to Cite
Kunang, S., & Samsil, A. (2019). PENERAPAN METODE 360 DERAJAT DAN ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) DALAM SISTEM PENILAIAN KINERJA PEGAWAI (STUDI KASUS : RUMAH SAKIT FADILAH PRABUMULIH). Jurnal Ilmiah Matrik, 20(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.33557/jurnalmatrik.v20i3.466
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 1860 times
PDF : 1969 times