Apakah yang Membuat Generasi Y Bahagia di Tempat Kerja? Studi Deskriptif dengan Tinjauan Sosiodemografis

  • Ira Hidayati Prodi Psikologi Islam Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Studi Agama UIN Raden Intan Lampung
Keywords: Subjective well being, Y Generation, Workplace

Abstract

This study aims to identify factors that influence happiness at work in generation Y employees based on sociodemographic review. The research method applied is descriptive quantitative method using survey method by looking at the frequency of respondents' answers and cross-tabulating with several categories of response answers. The approach used in this research is indigenous psychology. The research sample consisted of 200 employees. Data collection was conducted through purposive sampling technique using questions in a questionnaire developed by Kim (2009) Center For Indege- nous & Cultural Psychology (CCIP) Faculty of Psychology UGM and modified by the author according to research needs. The results showed that there are five factors that make a person happy at work, namely (1) positive relationships with others (2) achievement at work (3) work environment both physical and non-physical (4) compensation (5) the work factor itself. The positive relationship factor with others occupies the largest percentage of the other four factors. Furthermore, the results of the analysis based on sociodemographic reviews show that there is no difference between marital status and factors that affect happiness at work. Furthermore, there is no difference between employment status and factors affecting happiness at work. Based on the last level of education, there are variations in the results obtained. Based on gender, there are differences in the dominant factors affecting happiness at work

References

Alhempi, R. (2012). Kepemimpinan, Kompensasi, Dan Motivasi Serta Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja. Media Riset Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 58–80.

Azwar. (2013). Skala Penyusunan Psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.

Balogun, A. G. (2014). Dispositional factors , perceived social support and happiness among prison inmates in Nigeria : A new look N ijerya ’ daki hapishane mahkumlarında kişilik faktörleri , algıla nan sosyal destek ve. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 2(1), 16–33.

Beekman, T. (2011). “Fill in the generation gap: in exploring the traits that distinguish the different generations within your workforce, you’ll find some ideas regarding how you can get them to work together effectively” Strategic Finance. Gale Academic OneFile, 93.

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am Psychol, 34–43.

Gupta, V. (2012). Importance of Being Happy at Work. ISSN (Print, 1, 2319–5479. Keadaan Angkatan Kerja di Indonesia Agustus 2017. (2017). Badan Pusat Statistika. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2017/11/30/0daa04d8d9e8e30e43a55d1a/keadaan-angkatan-kerja-di-indonesia-agustus-2017.html

Kim, D. (2010). Indigenous And Cultural Psychology Memahami Orang Dalam Konteksnya. Pustaka Pelajar.

Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2001). Cultural Values and Happiness: an East‐West
Dialogue. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141 (4), 477‐493.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2003). Culture, Self, and the Reality of the Social. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3–4), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1403&4_17

Matalia. (2012). Pengaruh kepemimpinan dan hubungan kerja terhadap pengembangan karir dan kepuasan kerja pegawai di kantor sekretariat pemerintah daerah provinsi bali. Jurnal Manajemen, Strategi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 6(2), 185–194. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jmbk/article/view/2204/1401

Mujamiasih, M. (2013). Subjective Well-Being ( Swb ) : Studi Indigenous Pada PNS Dan Karyawan Swasta Yang Bersuku Jawa di Pulau Jawa. In Universitas Negeri Semarang (Issue Tidak dipublikasikan).

Munandar. (2001). Psikologi Industri Dan Organisasi. UI-Press.

Ningsih, D. A. (2024). Subjective Well Being Ditinjau Dari Faktor Demografi (Status Pernikahan, Jenis Kelamin, Pendapatan). Cognicia, 1.

Parry, E. and Urwin, P. J. (2011). Generational differences in work values: a review of theory and evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 79–96.

Pencari Kerja Indonesia Tidak Happy Oleh Pekerjaan Dalam Negeri. (2022). https://www.jobstreet.co.id/id/career-advice/article/pencari-kerja-indonesia-tidak-happy-dengan-pekerjaan-di-dalam-negeri

Prasetyo, A., Ratnaningsih, ika Z., & Prihatsanti, U. (2017). Bahagia di Tempat Kerja. Spektrum Nusantara.

Primasari, Ardi & Yuniarti, K. (2012). What make teenagers happy? An exploratory study using indigenous psychology approach. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 1.

Puput, J. (2018). Studi Sebut Milenial Sebagai Generasi yang Tak Bahagia. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/gaya-hidup/20180623204300-277-308441/studi-sebut-milenial-sebagai-generasi-yang-tak-bahagia

Putra, Y. (2016). Theoritical Review: Teori Perbedaan Generasi. 9(1952), 123–134.

Ruvendi, R. (2018). Imbalan Dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan Di Balai Besar Industri Hasil Pertanian Bogor. Jurnal Ilmiah Binaniaga, 1(01), 17. https://doi.org/10.33062/jib.v1i01.146
Sihombing, S. O., & Pongtuluran, F. D. (2011). Pengidentifikasian Dimensi-Dimensi Budaya Indonesia: Pengembangan Skala Dan Validasi. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_20

Smith, T. J., & Nichols, T. (2015). Understanding the Millennial Generation. Journal of Business Diversity, 15, 39–47.

Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Cultural constructions of happiness: theory and emprical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(3), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-004-8785-9

Varnum, M. E. W., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2010).
The origin of cultural differences in cognition: The social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359301
Published
2024-07-24
How to Cite
Hidayati, I. (2024). Apakah yang Membuat Generasi Y Bahagia di Tempat Kerja? Studi Deskriptif dengan Tinjauan Sosiodemografis. Jurnal Ilmiah Psyche, 18(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.33557/jpsyche.v18i1.3192
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 155 times
Jurnal Ilmiah Psyche : 135 times