Main Article Content

Siti Syahrah Adila
Faidah Yusuf
Nahdhiyah Nahdhiyah


Using the sociological theory of literature, the researchers agreed to study Leo Tolstoy's novel Anna Karenina, which will bring on connections in the social arts. In a descriptive qualitative, the investigator uses note sheets as analysis methods to evaluate knowledge to illustrate how the tension of social significance and religious hegemony arise. After an overview of the results, Leo Tolstoy in Anna Karenina Novel concludes his research finding on the social conflict. The social role and religious hegemony were expected. A social role is also a pit for social participants in their unconsciousness, such that conflict becomes an inseparable aspect and obstacles between groups in the social order, and religious hegemony, which in human behavior is manifested as an important role in the social realm of humans, religious instruction. Religion is a reference to the social and moral life.

Article Details

How to Cite
Adila, S., Yusuf, F., & Nahdhiyah, N. (2020). SOCIAL ROLE CONFLICT AND RELIGIOUS HEGEMONY: SOCIAL BACKGROUND IN ANNA KARENINA NOVEL BY LEO TOLSTOY. Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Bahasa, 13(02), 33–46. Retrieved from


Arifuddin. (2014). “An analysis of Social Conflict in Rick Riordan’s novel “The
Red Pyramid”.,-107,842(Online). Diunduh: 19 November 2019

Basri, Khairul. (2019). “Social Conflict Portrayed in John Michaelson's Novel
Diunduh: 19 November 2019

Boer, Roland. (2014). In The Vale of Tears. Leiden: Brill.

Damono, Supardi Djoko. (1979). Kesusastraan Indonesia Modern Beberapa Catatan. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Damono, Supardi Djoko. (2003). Sosiologi Sastra. Semarang: Magister Ilmu Susastra Universitas Diponegoro.

Durkheim, Emile. (1958). The Rules of Sociological Method. Glencoe: Fress Press.

Endraswara, Suwardi. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Widyatama.

Goldmann, Lucien. (1981). Method in the Sociology of Literature. England: Basil Blackwell Publisher Ltd.

Goldmann, Lucien. (1977a). Towards A Sociology of the Novel. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd.

Gramsci, Antonio. 2013. Prison NoteBook (Catatan-Catatan dari Penjara). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hoerip, Satyagraha. (1982). Sejumlah Masalah Sastra. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan

Marx, Karl. (2011). The German Ideology. Jakarta: Pustaka Nusantara.

Marx, Karl. (1844). A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Britania: Cambridge University Press.

Marx, Karl and Frederick Engels. (2007). The Holy Family. Russian: Foreign Languages Publishing House

Newman, B. M. & Newman, P. R. (1984). Development through Life: A Psychological Approach. 3rd edition. Chicago : The Dorsey Press.

Perrine, Lawrence. (1993). Literature, Structure, and Sound. New York: Harcourt BraceJovanovich Publisher.

Ritzer, George and Doglas J. Goodman. (2005). Theory of Sociology Modern. Edisi Keenam. Jakarta: Kencana.

Ritzer,George and Douglass J. Goodman. (2011). Theory of Sociology. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana. Hal: 153

Semi, M Atar. (1988). Anatomi Sastra. Padang: Sidharma

Semi, M Atar. (1990). Metode Penelitian Sastra. Padang :Angkasa.

Tolstoy, Leo. (2016). Anna Karenina. Jakarta: KPG

Wellek, Rene & Austin Warren, (1995). Theory of Literature. Jakarta: Abrams Books.

Wikipedia Indonesia. (2007). “Konflik”. Http:// Diunduh : September 2019